Log in

No account? Create an account
EA: The Human Story - ea_spouse Page 84 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

EA: The Human Story [Nov. 10th, 2004|12:01 am]
My significant other works for Electronic Arts, and I'm what you might call a disgruntled spouse.

EA's bright and shiny new corporate trademark is "Challenge Everything." Where this applies is not exactly clear. Churning out one licensed football game after another doesn't sound like challenging much of anything to me; it sounds like a money farm. To any EA executive that happens to read this, I have a good challenge for you: how about safe and sane labor practices for the people on whose backs you walk for your millions?

I am retaining some anonymity here because I have no illusions about what the consequences would be for my family if I was explicit. However, I also feel no impetus to shy away from sharing our story, because I know that it is too common to stick out among those of the thousands of engineers, artists, and designers that EA employs.

Our adventures with Electronic Arts began less than a year ago. The small game studio that my partner worked for collapsed as a result of foul play on the part of a big publisher -- another common story. Electronic Arts offered a job, the salary was right and the benefits were good, so my SO took it. I remember that they asked him in one of the interviews: "how do you feel about working long hours?" It's just a part of the game industry -- few studios can avoid a crunch as deadlines loom, so we thought nothing of it. When asked for specifics about what "working long hours" meant, the interviewers coughed and glossed on to the next question; now we know why.

Within weeks production had accelerated into a 'mild' crunch: eight hours six days a week. Not bad. Months remained until any real crunch would start, and the team was told that this "pre-crunch" was to prevent a big crunch toward the end; at this point any other need for a crunch seemed unlikely, as the project was dead on schedule. I don't know how many of the developers bought EA's explanation for the extended hours; we were new and naive so we did. The producers even set a deadline; they gave a specific date for the end of the crunch, which was still months away from the title's shipping date, so it seemed safe. That date came and went. And went, and went. When the next news came it was not about a reprieve; it was another acceleration: twelve hours six days a week, 9am to 10pm.

Weeks passed. Again the producers had given a termination date on this crunch that again they failed. Throughout this period the project remained on schedule. The long hours started to take its toll on the team; people grew irritable and some started to get ill. People dropped out in droves for a couple of days at a time, but then the team seemed to reach equilibrium again and they plowed ahead. The managers stopped even talking about a day when the hours would go back to normal.

Now, it seems, is the "real" crunch, the one that the producers of this title so wisely prepared their team for by running them into the ground ahead of time. The current mandatory hours are 9am to 10pm -- seven days a week -- with the occasional Saturday evening off for good behavior (at 6:30pm). This averages out to an eighty-five hour work week. Complaints that these once more extended hours combined with the team's existing fatigue would result in a greater number of mistakes made and an even greater amount of wasted energy were ignored.

The stress is taking its toll. After a certain number of hours spent working the eyes start to lose focus; after a certain number of weeks with only one day off fatigue starts to accrue and accumulate exponentially. There is a reason why there are two days in a weekend -- bad things happen to one's physical, emotional, and mental health if these days are cut short. The team is rapidly beginning to introduce as many flaws as they are removing.

And the kicker: for the honor of this treatment EA salaried employees receive a) no overtime; b) no compensation time! ('comp' time is the equalization of time off for overtime -- any hours spent during a crunch accrue into days off after the product has shipped); c) no additional sick or vacation leave. The time just goes away. Additionally, EA recently announced that, although in the past they have offered essentially a type of comp time in the form of a few weeks off at the end of a project, they no longer wish to do this, and employees shouldn't expect it. Further, since the production of various games is scattered, there was a concern on the part of the employees that developers would leave one crunch only to join another. EA's response was that they would attempt to minimize this, but would make no guarantees. This is unthinkable; they are pushing the team to individual physical health limits, and literally giving them nothing for it. Comp time is a staple in this industry, but EA as a corporation wishes to "minimize" this reprieve. One would think that the proper way to minimize comp time is to avoid crunch, but this brutal crunch has been on for months, and nary a whisper about any compensation leave, nor indeed of any end of this treatment.

This crunch also differs from crunch time in a smaller studio in that it was not an emergency effort to save a project from failure. Every step of the way, the project remained on schedule. Crunching neither accelerated this nor slowed it down; its effect on the actual product was not measurable. The extended hours were deliberate and planned; the management knew what they were doing as they did it. The love of my life comes home late at night complaining of a headache that will not go away and a chronically upset stomach, and my happy supportive smile is running out.

No one works in the game industry unless they love what they do. No one on that team is interested in producing an inferior product. My heart bleeds for this team precisely BECAUSE they are brilliant, talented individuals out to create something great. They are and were more than willing to work hard for the success of the title. But that good will has only been met with abuse. Amazingly, Electronic Arts was listed #91 on Fortune magazine's "100 Best Companies to Work For" in 2003.

EA's attitude toward this -- which is actually a part of company policy, it now appears -- has been (in an anonymous quotation that I've heard repeated by multiple managers), "If they don't like it, they can work someplace else." Put up or shut up and leave: this is the core of EA's Human Resources policy. The concept of ethics or compassion or even intelligence with regard to getting the most out of one's workforce never enters the equation: if they don't want to sacrifice their lives and their health and their talent so that a multibillion dollar corporation can continue its Godzilla-stomp through the game industry, they can work someplace else.

But can they?

The EA Mambo, paired with other giants such as Vivendi, Sony, and Microsoft, is rapidly either crushing or absorbing the vast majority of the business in game development. A few standalone studios that made their fortunes in previous eras -- Blizzard, Bioware, and Id come to mind -- manage to still survive, but 2004 saw the collapse of dozens of small game studios, no longer able to acquire contracts in the face of rapid and massive consolidation of game publishing companies. This is an epidemic hardly unfamiliar to anyone working in the industry. Though, of course, it is always the option of talent to go outside the industry, perhaps venturing into the booming commercial software development arena. (Read my tired attempt at sarcasm.)

To put some of this in perspective, I myself consider some figures. If EA truly believes that it needs to push its employees this hard -- I actually believe that they don't, and that it is a skewed operations perspective alone that results in the severity of their crunching, coupled with a certain expected amount of the inefficiency involved in running an enterprise as large as theirs -- the solution therefore should be to hire more engineers, or artists, or designers, as the case may be. Never should it be an option to punish one's workforce with ninety hour weeks; in any other industry the company in question would find itself sued out of business so fast its stock wouldn't even have time to tank. In its first weekend, Madden 2005 grossed $65 million. EA's annual revenue is approximately $2.5 billion. This company is not strapped for cash; their labor practices are inexcusable.

The interesting thing about this is an assumption that most of the employees seem to be operating under. Whenever the subject of hours come up, inevitably, it seems, someone mentions 'exemption'. They refer to a California law that supposedly exempts businesses from having to pay overtime to certain 'specialty' employees, including software programmers. This is Senate Bill 88. However, Senate Bill 88 specifically does not apply to the entertainment industry -- television, motion picture, and theater industries are specifically mentioned. Further, even in software, there is a pay minimum on the exemption: those exempt must be paid at least $90,000 annually. I can assure you that the majority of EA employees are in fact not in this pay bracket; ergo, these practices are not only unethical, they are illegal.

I look at our situation and I ask 'us': why do you stay? And the answer is that in all likelihood we won't; and in all likelihood if we had known that this would be the result of working for EA, we would have stayed far away in the first place. But all along the way there were deceptions, there were promises, there were assurances -- there was a big fancy office building with an expensive fish tank -- all of which in the end look like an elaborate scheme to keep a crop of employees on the project just long enough to get it shipped. And then if they need to, they hire in a new batch, fresh and ready to hear more promises that will not be kept; EA's turnover rate in engineering is approximately 50%. This is how EA works. So now we know, now we can move on, right? That seems to be what happens to everyone else. But it's not enough. Because in the end, regardless of what happens with our particular situation, this kind of "business" isn't right, and people need to know about it, which is why I write this today.

If I could get EA CEO Larry Probst on the phone, there are a few things I would ask him. "What's your salary?" would be merely a point of curiosity. The main thing I want to know is, Larry: you do realize what you're doing to your people, right? And you do realize that they ARE people, with physical limits, emotional lives, and families, right? Voices and talents and senses of humor and all that? That when you keep our husbands and wives and children in the office for ninety hours a week, sending them home exhausted and numb and frustrated with their lives, it's not just them you're hurting, but everyone around them, everyone who loves them? When you make your profit calculations and your cost analyses, you know that a great measure of that cost is being paid in raw human dignity, right?



This article is offered under the Creative Commons deed. Please feel free to redistribute/link.

Page 84 of 87
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] >>
From: (Anonymous)
2008-10-27 12:47 am (UTC)

Cosmic Justice

EA will fall, like any evil. I'm not too sure what's happening with the quality of it's employee's lives, but I do know that they are sweating over the trespassing into peoples systems thing. They are so greedy that they tried to stop ANYONE pirating the game with their invasive SecuRom crap, and as a result EVERYONE pirates the game and they are going to get sued by every individual who steps forward to complain about it (There is some hot-shot californian lawyer who has volunteered to take on every individuals case worldwide, free of charge, because he knows he is going to win). I am actually going to buy a copy just so I can join this crusade. Give them their last $80, then take away everything.

Burn to the ground, you bastards.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: anaya_mithaleil
2008-11-25 03:06 pm (UTC)

Thanks for the warning.

I only today started to think of a career as a storywriter/setting creator for games. Because a good friend told me I should try as I have the passion for it. Now I read this I know to definitely NOT to try and contact EA for it. So I would like to say thanks for the warning! I'll try other companies instead.

(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2008-12-11 06:01 pm (UTC)


That's some craziness. I'm in the Army and yeah we do have some long hours, but in the end, we get time off to re-fuel. EA is looking like a slave shop here. That's some real harsh employee treatment.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-02-01 09:35 pm (UTC)
then tell your fucking partner to quit and get over it
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-02-14 06:52 pm (UTC)
hah. I remember reading this in 04. How much money did you get from the lawsuit?
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-03-27 01:56 pm (UTC)

The reason

It was a test against companies in third world nations who offer their services at a fraction of US costs. From what you have described ... they tried to crunch the numbers.

All of which could have been avoided with simple math. Though, we are talking about 'suit' logic, so I was not surprised and it does not help when management are a bunch of 'yes' men.

For instance : A programmer in the US goes between 15 to 75 per hour, per programmer. When a software company [insert country here, exclude US,EU,AU,JP,etc] will do the same job between 10 to 20 per hour (US) ... now here is the kicker, that is not 10 to 20 per programmer, that is for the entire companies staff.

One could argue that you get what you pay for, but that is the problem. You will get 'US' quality work. In fact, their educational system is far more dedicated than our own and near, if not as advanced.

In the US, there really is no consequences for failure on the academic level or even in the job market, if there are any, it is very minimal. Where in other countries, if you fail, you go hungry. If you lose your job because you can not handle 85 hours a week ... you starve, your family starves. There is no middle class, you are either wealthy or poor ... VERY poor.

That is what the US was up against before 2004 and now in 2009 ... there are plenty of jobs, but they are no longer in the US.

Your SO, co workers and the company put up a good fight, I wish they could have pulled it off, but you just can not crunch the numbers.

Anyhow, it's been 5 years later since you wrote that, I hope your family is doing great. I will assume your SO gave them the birdie, rather than the AK47 and started his own game studio. Aye, that's a good ending ... well, in truth I prefer the AK47 bit, but I guess we'll leave that to a MOD, maybe your SO's first title >=)
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-06-04 11:14 pm (UTC)


I'm also in the game development industry thus I know how tough schedule crunches can be. In software development, any person who lies in the "critical path" must always strive to meet deadlines, if not, minimize delays since all those expecting his/her outputs would also suffer the crunch. This principle has been very much abused by large companies especially in regions where labor is relatively cheaper.

You may check out our site (http://www.grandmatrix.com/) if you want to.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-07-09 07:56 pm (UTC)


It is a horrible story to hear, and as a 3D artist doing my degree in 3D animation at the University of Hertfordshire, it is truly shocking. I dislike the money churning practises of EA anyway but to hear first hand how they achieve this is unforgivable. Rest assured that when I go into the industry (and I intend to) I will steer clear of Electronic Arts!
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-07-16 02:09 am (UTC)
They're still doing it. I have a friend who is working 6am to 9pm 7 days a week as his project approaches release.

Despite Riccitiello's assurances otherwise, his middle management is fighting him and refusing to change. They are still paying below-the-poverty-line wages, they still are incapable of figuring out a schedule that doesn't involve abuse of its employees, and they are still playing games with employee classifications to avoid providing full benefits.

I'm in the industry, and if my company ever got acquired by EA, I would quit on the spot. My salary would be cut, my hours increased without compensation, and my work transformed into a bureaucratic mess (I've heard how heavy in middle management EA is). I'd be spending more time filling out useless make-the-managers-look-busy reports and attending endless meetings than coding and documenting. Nothing is worth this price, and people looking to enter the industry need to realize that.

Anyone but EA.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: brasswatchman
2009-08-26 08:32 am (UTC)
Hm. Sounds a lot like the film industry in a lot of ways to me.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-12-18 08:13 pm (UTC)

I avoid everything EA

I avoid their games I avoid the employment chance . I avoid anything and everything to do with the company . EA is the big EVIL spreading EVIL . I pray for the day EA passes away .
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2010-10-14 02:31 pm (UTC)

"What's you Salary"

If I could get EA CEO Larry Probst on the phone, there are a few things I would ask him. "What's your salary?" - it's public information listed in the 8-K filing.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2010-12-16 11:55 am (UTC)
I want to get into the game industry, but I want to avoid an EA company... but they've bought a lot of companies... I mean even Scrabble on Facebook has their logo on it?! I want to avoid their games, and it's like trying to avoid 'Made in China' merchandise... . Before anyone start, I am Chinese, I get to say that.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2011-01-11 06:34 pm (UTC)

порно видео

Ваш блог мне очень понравился, только допишите эту статью
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2011-01-13 09:24 am (UTC)

Only saying hi all, this site seems to be surprisingly neat

Unquestionably, I’m a sucker for it, interesting and well-founded ideas. Be sure to publish more fascinating articles in your.
(Reply) (Thread)
Page 84 of 87
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] >>