Log in

No account? Create an account
ea_spouse [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

EA: The Human Story [Nov. 10th, 2004|12:01 am]
My significant other works for Electronic Arts, and I'm what you might call a disgruntled spouse.

EA's bright and shiny new corporate trademark is "Challenge Everything." Where this applies is not exactly clear. Churning out one licensed football game after another doesn't sound like challenging much of anything to me; it sounds like a money farm. To any EA executive that happens to read this, I have a good challenge for you: how about safe and sane labor practices for the people on whose backs you walk for your millions?

I am retaining some anonymity here because I have no illusions about what the consequences would be for my family if I was explicit. However, I also feel no impetus to shy away from sharing our story, because I know that it is too common to stick out among those of the thousands of engineers, artists, and designers that EA employs.

Our adventures with Electronic Arts began less than a year ago. The small game studio that my partner worked for collapsed as a result of foul play on the part of a big publisher -- another common story. Electronic Arts offered a job, the salary was right and the benefits were good, so my SO took it. I remember that they asked him in one of the interviews: "how do you feel about working long hours?" It's just a part of the game industry -- few studios can avoid a crunch as deadlines loom, so we thought nothing of it. When asked for specifics about what "working long hours" meant, the interviewers coughed and glossed on to the next question; now we know why.

Within weeks production had accelerated into a 'mild' crunch: eight hours six days a week. Not bad. Months remained until any real crunch would start, and the team was told that this "pre-crunch" was to prevent a big crunch toward the end; at this point any other need for a crunch seemed unlikely, as the project was dead on schedule. I don't know how many of the developers bought EA's explanation for the extended hours; we were new and naive so we did. The producers even set a deadline; they gave a specific date for the end of the crunch, which was still months away from the title's shipping date, so it seemed safe. That date came and went. And went, and went. When the next news came it was not about a reprieve; it was another acceleration: twelve hours six days a week, 9am to 10pm.

Weeks passed. Again the producers had given a termination date on this crunch that again they failed. Throughout this period the project remained on schedule. The long hours started to take its toll on the team; people grew irritable and some started to get ill. People dropped out in droves for a couple of days at a time, but then the team seemed to reach equilibrium again and they plowed ahead. The managers stopped even talking about a day when the hours would go back to normal.

Now, it seems, is the "real" crunch, the one that the producers of this title so wisely prepared their team for by running them into the ground ahead of time. The current mandatory hours are 9am to 10pm -- seven days a week -- with the occasional Saturday evening off for good behavior (at 6:30pm). This averages out to an eighty-five hour work week. Complaints that these once more extended hours combined with the team's existing fatigue would result in a greater number of mistakes made and an even greater amount of wasted energy were ignored.

The stress is taking its toll. After a certain number of hours spent working the eyes start to lose focus; after a certain number of weeks with only one day off fatigue starts to accrue and accumulate exponentially. There is a reason why there are two days in a weekend -- bad things happen to one's physical, emotional, and mental health if these days are cut short. The team is rapidly beginning to introduce as many flaws as they are removing.

And the kicker: for the honor of this treatment EA salaried employees receive a) no overtime; b) no compensation time! ('comp' time is the equalization of time off for overtime -- any hours spent during a crunch accrue into days off after the product has shipped); c) no additional sick or vacation leave. The time just goes away. Additionally, EA recently announced that, although in the past they have offered essentially a type of comp time in the form of a few weeks off at the end of a project, they no longer wish to do this, and employees shouldn't expect it. Further, since the production of various games is scattered, there was a concern on the part of the employees that developers would leave one crunch only to join another. EA's response was that they would attempt to minimize this, but would make no guarantees. This is unthinkable; they are pushing the team to individual physical health limits, and literally giving them nothing for it. Comp time is a staple in this industry, but EA as a corporation wishes to "minimize" this reprieve. One would think that the proper way to minimize comp time is to avoid crunch, but this brutal crunch has been on for months, and nary a whisper about any compensation leave, nor indeed of any end of this treatment.

This crunch also differs from crunch time in a smaller studio in that it was not an emergency effort to save a project from failure. Every step of the way, the project remained on schedule. Crunching neither accelerated this nor slowed it down; its effect on the actual product was not measurable. The extended hours were deliberate and planned; the management knew what they were doing as they did it. The love of my life comes home late at night complaining of a headache that will not go away and a chronically upset stomach, and my happy supportive smile is running out.

No one works in the game industry unless they love what they do. No one on that team is interested in producing an inferior product. My heart bleeds for this team precisely BECAUSE they are brilliant, talented individuals out to create something great. They are and were more than willing to work hard for the success of the title. But that good will has only been met with abuse. Amazingly, Electronic Arts was listed #91 on Fortune magazine's "100 Best Companies to Work For" in 2003.

EA's attitude toward this -- which is actually a part of company policy, it now appears -- has been (in an anonymous quotation that I've heard repeated by multiple managers), "If they don't like it, they can work someplace else." Put up or shut up and leave: this is the core of EA's Human Resources policy. The concept of ethics or compassion or even intelligence with regard to getting the most out of one's workforce never enters the equation: if they don't want to sacrifice their lives and their health and their talent so that a multibillion dollar corporation can continue its Godzilla-stomp through the game industry, they can work someplace else.

But can they?

The EA Mambo, paired with other giants such as Vivendi, Sony, and Microsoft, is rapidly either crushing or absorbing the vast majority of the business in game development. A few standalone studios that made their fortunes in previous eras -- Blizzard, Bioware, and Id come to mind -- manage to still survive, but 2004 saw the collapse of dozens of small game studios, no longer able to acquire contracts in the face of rapid and massive consolidation of game publishing companies. This is an epidemic hardly unfamiliar to anyone working in the industry. Though, of course, it is always the option of talent to go outside the industry, perhaps venturing into the booming commercial software development arena. (Read my tired attempt at sarcasm.)

To put some of this in perspective, I myself consider some figures. If EA truly believes that it needs to push its employees this hard -- I actually believe that they don't, and that it is a skewed operations perspective alone that results in the severity of their crunching, coupled with a certain expected amount of the inefficiency involved in running an enterprise as large as theirs -- the solution therefore should be to hire more engineers, or artists, or designers, as the case may be. Never should it be an option to punish one's workforce with ninety hour weeks; in any other industry the company in question would find itself sued out of business so fast its stock wouldn't even have time to tank. In its first weekend, Madden 2005 grossed $65 million. EA's annual revenue is approximately $2.5 billion. This company is not strapped for cash; their labor practices are inexcusable.

The interesting thing about this is an assumption that most of the employees seem to be operating under. Whenever the subject of hours come up, inevitably, it seems, someone mentions 'exemption'. They refer to a California law that supposedly exempts businesses from having to pay overtime to certain 'specialty' employees, including software programmers. This is Senate Bill 88. However, Senate Bill 88 specifically does not apply to the entertainment industry -- television, motion picture, and theater industries are specifically mentioned. Further, even in software, there is a pay minimum on the exemption: those exempt must be paid at least $90,000 annually. I can assure you that the majority of EA employees are in fact not in this pay bracket; ergo, these practices are not only unethical, they are illegal.

I look at our situation and I ask 'us': why do you stay? And the answer is that in all likelihood we won't; and in all likelihood if we had known that this would be the result of working for EA, we would have stayed far away in the first place. But all along the way there were deceptions, there were promises, there were assurances -- there was a big fancy office building with an expensive fish tank -- all of which in the end look like an elaborate scheme to keep a crop of employees on the project just long enough to get it shipped. And then if they need to, they hire in a new batch, fresh and ready to hear more promises that will not be kept; EA's turnover rate in engineering is approximately 50%. This is how EA works. So now we know, now we can move on, right? That seems to be what happens to everyone else. But it's not enough. Because in the end, regardless of what happens with our particular situation, this kind of "business" isn't right, and people need to know about it, which is why I write this today.

If I could get EA CEO Larry Probst on the phone, there are a few things I would ask him. "What's your salary?" would be merely a point of curiosity. The main thing I want to know is, Larry: you do realize what you're doing to your people, right? And you do realize that they ARE people, with physical limits, emotional lives, and families, right? Voices and talents and senses of humor and all that? That when you keep our husbands and wives and children in the office for ninety hours a week, sending them home exhausted and numb and frustrated with their lives, it's not just them you're hurting, but everyone around them, everyone who loves them? When you make your profit calculations and your cost analyses, you know that a great measure of that cost is being paid in raw human dignity, right?



This article is offered under the Creative Commons deed. Please feel free to redistribute/link.

Page 45 of 87
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] >>
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 01:04 pm (UTC)
Woah, I had no idea EA was like this. Thankyou for opening my eyes...
(Reply) (Thread)
From: jameshetfield
2004-11-15 01:53 pm (UTC)
wow. For someone who is interested in getting into the gaming indusry this is kind of a kick in the groin.

Granted I've never even thought of working for EA, but I'm very far away from working for any gaming comany at this point, i'm a sophmore in college and i have a program due tomorrow that is like childsplay compared to a game and i'm having problems with it. (stupid java). and considering i've put about 20~30 hours into something simple and small. while a game is a massive project that would take thousands of hours. Just makes me feel quite inferior.

Hope the your SO can get either a better job or better hours.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: xyloid
2004-11-15 01:54 pm (UTC)
I think that your situation is horrible, and it should be rectified immeadiately. from reading a few of these comments i have seen that this isn't a problem unique to you, so why not let the whole company go to hell? organize a strike. not just of the software engineers, but of anyone who you think might be friendly to your cause. i realizsed that EA would probably just fire the vast majority of the strikers, but if you aren't satisfied with your career, then you should take that risk.

but this is just the opinion of a 15 year old.

(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 02:04 pm (UTC)

I feel so guilty.

I was planning on buying NFSU2 tomorrow, up until I read this, anyway. I noticed that EA games had short developement cycles but never did I imagine that it was because of this. Thanks for opening up my eyes. :)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: shinzakura
2004-11-15 02:18 pm (UTC)

Re: I feel so guilty.

Same here. I don't plan to ever buy another EA game until this is rectified. Thanks for opening my eyes on this.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
Re: Punishment - (Anonymous) Expand
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 02:05 pm (UTC)


This is the philosophy of most corporations; they do not care about the health of their employees unless there is something killing them off. They only want a profit.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 02:21 pm (UTC)

Form A Union

That's all. Do it, don't complain, don't wish you could talk to the CEO. I don't particularly like unions. Once they accomplish the purpose for which they were created they tend to be more harmful than good, but in some instances they are the only answer. So... form a union... go on strike... negotiate better contracts... No company ever got a union who didn't deserve it, and from what you say, a union may be the answer. EA certainly sounds like they deserve it. So, let me close this post by saying, FORM A UNION!

Good luck
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 02:25 pm (UTC)

EA walking on the backs of the bruised...

It's not a popular point of view in the current political administration, and no-one ever thought it needed in corporate America, it's usually started as a "blue collar" thing, but start a Union.

(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: jnork
2004-11-15 02:49 pm (UTC)
Get out. Now.

I've been burned out, though not as badly as you're describing. The results can be devastating. Almost 30 years later and I can still see the effects in myself.

I've been burned out again, and this time it wasn't the job -- it was dealing with an autistic daughter and a wife who burned out dealing with that daughter. She's recovered better than I have. Inherent flexibility? Relative youth? (She's 6 years younger.) Or maybe it's tougher for me because I've already been burned out before. Maybe all of the above. I don't know. Recovery is slow. Losing my job didn't help either.

In any case, I've found that burnout creeps up on you. You don't know you're burning out until it's too late. That's how it worked for me, anyway.

Depression and anxiety are almost guaranteed. From the sound of it, he's going to go through a bad time even if he quits now. If he waits until he can't function any more, it's going to be worse.

My own recommendation: Get out now. I realize your situation may not make that easy, but it's going to be harder when you have to quit anyway, or get laid off, and there's no more resilience left.

I've been out of work since March 2003. The money is starting to run out. I was lucky enough to have some retirement money to tap, and my father has been lending me some cash so I don't have to keep paying penalties on early disbursements. But we're selling the house and moving in with our parents in the hopes that the situation will be better where they are. Starting over in my late 40s with two kids (one autistic) in a depressed economy isn't fun, but we have no choice. Try not to let yourself get into the same situation.


Best of luck.

And I won't be buying any EA games either.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 03:20 pm (UTC)

Not just the game industry

I think the problem complained about here extends beyond EA and the game industry. Many businesses (not the least of which is law firms, from which I recently escaped) seem to have determined that hiring fewer and expecting more is good for the bottom line, even if turnover goes through the roof. And there seem to be fewer and fewer companies that are competing to provide saner work hours. To some extent, professional-type services are becoming commodified.

The answer seems obvious to me: we need new wage-hour laws that reduce the incentive for companies to overwork employees. Right now, in a loose labor market, turnover is a minor annoyance at best, while reduced labor costs (by avoiding hiring more people to share the load) go straight to the bottom line.

An irony: economists consider it good news that worker productivity has continued to increase during this past recession. I always wonder if increased "productivity" statistics are simply a result of the same people working longer and longer hours (with no increase in pay).
(Reply) (Thread)
From: bwingb
2004-11-15 03:35 pm (UTC)


Now I am a Canadian but in times like this, there's nothing like the good ole' American way! I don't mean to be heavy handed, but please read on here and remember why we here in North America have had it so good for so long.

The Liberty Song; information:

The tune is the English air, Heart of Oak. These American words were written by John Dickinson and published in 1768. Dickinson was one of the leaders of the American Revolution, a famous lawyer and Governor of Delaware and Pennsylvania.

The music to Heart of Oak was by Dr. William Boyce (1711-1779). The English words were by David Garrick.

Dr Boyce was a songwriter in London, beginning around 1730. In 1757 he reached the peak of his career, being put in charge of the King's Band of Musick, a position which Purcell held much earlier. He received a doctorate in 1749. In 1758 he was the organist at the Chapel Royal. His first compositions to appear in print were published in 1747. Boyce retired from music due to deafness and retired to Dorset.

Garrick is credited with the theatrical blessing, "Break a Leg" as he was reportedly so involved in his performance of Richard III that he did not notice the pain of a fracture he incurred.

The Liberty Song


Come, join hand in hand, brave Americans all,
And rouse your bold hearts at fair Liberty's call;
No tyrannous acts shall suppress your just claim,
Or stain with dishonor America's name.


In Freedom we're born and in Freedom we'll live.
Our purses are ready. Steady, friends, steady;
Not as slaves, but as Freemen our money we'll give.

Our worthy forefathers, let's give them a cheer,
To climates unknown did courageously steer;
Thro' oceans to deserts for Freedom they came,
And dying, bequeath'd us their freedom and fame.


The tree their own hands had to Liberty rear'd,
They lived to behold growing strong and revered;
With transport they cried, Now our wishes we gain,
For our children shall gather the fruits of our pain.


Then join hand in hand, brave Americans all,
By uniting we stand, by dividing we fall;
In so righteous a cause let us hope to succeed,
For heaven approves of each generous deed.


In Freedom we're born and in Freedom we'll live.
Our purses are ready. Steady, friends, steady;
Not as slaves, but as Freemen our money we'll give.


(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 03:36 pm (UTC)

What's Larry's worth?

Check out the link below:


I think the people working at EA should start a class action lawsuit!

(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 03:48 pm (UTC)

Bitch and Moan oiverpaid techies

go to mcdonalds or a factory, then back to your air-conditioned offices with free coffee
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 03:51 pm (UTC)

Re: Bitch and Moan oiverpaid techies

You're an idiot that can't even spell you belong at Mickey D's. Maybe if you could string together a complete sentence you would be able to find a butter job.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]From: thewhiterook
2004-11-15 04:16 pm (UTC)

Software Developers -- Not just game developers

I can sympathise. I work for a software company and I've seen these kinds of crunches quite frequently. Already I'm on a project with many developers booked for more time than they have. It was nice when we'd get compensated for this, but now salaries have been frozen and bonuses are few and far between.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 04:16 pm (UTC)

nothing will happen

Everyone is talking about "let's take a stand or strike or create a union, trust me, all you over paid jackasses have no back bones and won't do jack about anything.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 05:54 pm (UTC)

overpaid huh

Not sure what jerkwater hillbilly town you're from but here in SF or LA where the poster is from I think costs of living are thru the roof.
Bah why am I bothering, you're probably one of those 59 million hicks in the flyover who voted for Bush.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
Re: overpaid huh - (Anonymous) Expand
Re: overpaid huh - (Anonymous) Expand
From: rhalin
2004-11-15 04:24 pm (UTC)

EA Stock annoyingness

Kind of annoying to check stock prices today and see that EA has climbed up 2.1 points since falling a bit on friday - probably thanks in part to the brief coverage recommending EA as a trade on cbs marketwatch.

Anyone who has or used to have stocks want to visit these message boards and start asking questions about how the impending class action lawsuit regarding unpaid labor will effect stock prices?


Any other stock site message boards would also be good places to post some links to the story.

Big companies seem to only understand one thing - hit 'em where it hurts, their pocket. I'd be nice if we could see some stock prices drop by the end of the week, and some mass-media attention start up. It might not happen, but its worth a shot.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2004-11-15 06:22 pm (UTC)

Re: EA Stock annoyingness

Try also voting on Lawrence F. Probst on Forbes using this link.


His reputation on here has been dire for months, and this sort of thing can only make it worse.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
Page 45 of 87
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] >>